TO FAITHgreenspun.com : LUSENET : Ask Jesus : One Thread |
Moderators Note:
-- ZAROVE (ZAROFF3@JUNO.COM), October 24, 2004
OK- lets settle this...Faith, you are mad because I made an acusation agsint your Charecter. However, as everyone now knows, the accusation in that instance was nto literal, but designed ot show Ians fault. Your fault wa sin contoinuing to Indulge in the arguent with Ian and not lettign me handle it.
Ian had made a Minor breach of board dcorum, and I had to call him on it. To justify this, he attacked you. I agreed withthe attack to make a point, that his behaviour is gauges independantly of your behaviour, and no matter what you did his own actions are gauged independantly. To this end I called you rude.
Then, you mistook this as an acuation, whereas it was intended only as a point for Ian.
Then, you contonued to pos which threatened to cause more problems on the htread.
Now thi argument has consumed 5 thread where you ar eisnsiting that I apologise or prove you have been rude. I wiull email you evidence of you ebig rude, but first you must nderstand that every little slight isnt intended as a direct attack on your charecter.
Now, O am askign kidnly, pelase let this matter slide. You a e a valued contributor here.
If you dont and insist on continuing to defend yourself agasint soemthign that sint even attackign you, then yo gve your oponants licence to critisise you, and sience you becoem the cente of focus, this is within their rights by baord rules but causes conflict which I dread needig to clear up.
Now, once the Paswords work again, I will delete all further conversation on this matter after the 27th of October. The matter will be rsolved then, and posst on the topic will be removed o prevent further incedent.
all ask is that you unerstand wehre you misundertsood my intent, and accept hat this was a misundertsandign that got out of conrole, and stop postign on the matter.
Thank you.
-- ZAROVE (ZAROFF3@JUNO.COM), October 24, 2004.
I reject your spin on this Zarove and I say that I did not misunderstand you what-so-ever.I already said I was finshed with this because I feel I drove home my point and it is clear that I was wronged.
You are over-stepping what it is that you should be doing as moderator. You are censoring posts now. You can't tell me that I cannot carry on a discussion with Ian if he is posting something that I reject. The only person who should have been admonished in that was Ian because he attacked me personally.
I was never rude. Get that straight Zarove--okay?
Even your claim that your fault was in continuing to Indulge in the argument with Ian and not letting me handle it. ...is ridiculous. Show me the post where I continued to indulge in argument with Ian. oh never mind--you can't.
Why do you think we are not allowed to disagree or argue--anyway? And from now on--don't do me any favors by coming to my defense if you are going to agree with them and call me names while you are at it. This new spin about you speaking rhetorically is false!
But I am done with this--you proved me right by not supporting yourself with any evidence. I won't hold my breath waiting for your evidence to come via email. It doesn't exist.
If you want this over--then you need to let it go.
-- ("faith01@myway.com"), October 24, 2004.
I reject your spin on this Zarove and I say that I did not misunderstand you what-so-ever.{Yet evidence states otherwise...}-Zarove
I already said I was finshed with this because I feel I drove home my point and it is clear that I was wronged.
{I had not seen that when I posted this...}-Zarove
You are over-stepping what it is that you should be doing as moderator. You are censoring posts now.
{No, Im just not allowign posts on a certain tpic to exist because they are inciteful and in vilation of board rules...David did the same thing.}-Zarove
You can't tell me that I cannot carry on a discussion with Ian if he is posting something that I reject.
{ And thats not what I said at all. Your free to discuss anythign with Ian, just this current issue is to be dropped.}-Zarove
The only person who should have been admonished in that was Ian because he attacked me personally.
{Ironiclaly enough, we was th eonly one Admonished, you mistook my use of you rhetorically as a slight agaisnt you.}-Zarove
I was never rude. Get that straight Zarove--okay?
{The above sntence is rude. Likewise, not listnign to other parties is rude, even if you disagree you ought to listen/.}-Zarove
Even your claim that your fault was in continuing to Indulge in the argument with Ian and not letting me handle it. ...is ridiculous. Show me the post where I continued to indulge in argument with Ian. oh never mind--you can't.
{Its int he oritgional thread... I can, but there is no need...}- Zarove
Why do you think we are not allowed to disagree or argue--anyway?
{ Again you misundertsnad. Youa re free to here. You are fre to oice anti-Catholic concerns. Youa re free to voice disagreement. You are even free to be rude. what you arnet fre to do is cause discord which interees with nromal posting on the board.}-Zarove
And from now on--don't do me any favors by coming to my defense if you are going to agree with them and call me names while you are at it. This new spin about you speaking rhetorically is false!
{Uhm... hello Faiht, my name is Zarove... I speak rhetoriclaly a lot... its not flase, just part of who I am. And I wasnt meanign an offence, you just took it as such. And whose "them'. The inital post was to gt after Ian.}-Zarove
But I am done with this--you proved me right by not supporting yourself with any evidence.
{I have evidence Faith, the whole 5 threads we concumed on tis matter is evidence...}-Zarove
I won't hold my breath waiting for your evidence to come via email. It doesn't exist.
{Oh, but your wrong, and een Jame sposte dsome publiclaly...}-Zarove
If you want this over--then you need to let it go.
{I tried, you kept ranting, then the others who oppsoe tyou joiend in to accuse you. Me lettign it frop wpil be neglegence.}-Zarove
-- ZAROVE (ZAROFF3@JUNO.COM), October 24, 2004.
I have saved every thread in a folder, Zarove--because they exonerate me.I really am done with this.
-- ("faith01@myway.com"), October 24, 2004.
No, they dont. If youj read the threads, you will see that you made a huge issue over a small slight that wasnt even intentional.
-- ZAROVE (ZAROFF3@JUNO.COM), October 24, 2004.
You can refer to it as a *small slight* until it snows in July, Zarove.I see it as an unwarrented attack on my character.
In any event--I am done.
If you want this to drag on even more--then you will have to do it without me.
-- ("faith01@myway.com"), October 24, 2004.
i think this forum means everything to zarove,every new discussion is like a battle for him where he has to prove himself and come out of it as a winner
-- sdqa (sdqa@sdqa.com), December 23, 2004.
Theres plenty of discussions I don bother entering.Mostly Im neutral... I just prefer acaemic standards ot be higher.That said, I think your a troll with soemthign personal agaisnt me. Prove me wrong by posting somethign relevant...
Readers, Unfortunately this forum closed due to maintence problems with the server.
If you are interested in continuing a discussion, you can go to this board:
http://p221.ezboard.com/bthechristianforum
This was our back up board, but now we all relocated here.
Hope to see you there!
-- David Ortiz (cyberpunk1986@prodigy.net), July 14, 2005.
-- ZAROVE (ZAROFF3@JUNO.COM), December 23, 2004.