The first paragraph of this article is unnecessarily full of name calling but the rest is quite interesting.

http://www.americanpolitics.com/20010226Cheney.html

-- Anonymous, February 28, 2001

Answers

Pam did you see any reference to a B-J? Libraries? or even a single WH teacup at that Haliburton link?

What's to investigate then? wink-wink

-- Anonymous, February 28, 2001

Let's all go read Joe Farah's World Net Daily Y2k articles from a coupla years ago! Same substance, same M.O. Same believability. Same smell.

-- Anonymous, March 01, 2001

C.L. Why do you disreguard the information about him?

-- Anonymous, March 01, 2001

Why, Cherri?

For the same reasons I disregarded Joe Farah's "factual" stories pre-Y2k. Which were 98% BS. They were "too good to be true".

Dick Cheney is a career man; no dummy. To think that he would leave his ass hanging out the door so obviously, just waiting for some cub reporter to come along and kick it, is sheer lunacy.

As the author of the article sums up, "here's the story as I understand it".

I need to see something a lot more substantial than that.

That's why.

-- Anonymous, March 01, 2001

Ah click the first link in the story dumbo for the skinny on where "she understood it from".

BTW, Joe Farah is a Bush guy, hello!

Dick Cheney, oil guy? war strategist? trusted governmental aide? buttkissing tiwt who would sell his own mother for a buck? you make the call.

-- Anonymous, March 01, 2001

Doc, it is very simple. Take a look at the site which hosted the article. Now take a look at their philosophy statement. Now do you see why anything they print is questionable? In case you do not have time, let me quote part of it for you:

We can only reply by saying that with respect to our penchant for poking fun at the political Luddites and maniacs at the head of America's conservative movement -- including the illegitimately selected George DumbBellYuh Bush (we know... there we go again) -- that we subscribe to the doctrine of Paul Kirkpatrick, who could not have put it better:

"I will give our new president the same level of support and encouragement that was given to the current administration by such luminaries as Tom DeLay, Trent Lott, Rush Limbaugh, Richard [Mellon] Scaife, Ted Olson, [Paul Greenberg] and, of course, George W. himself. In other words, I will badmouth the president daily, I will work in whatever small way I can to defeat and undermine his programs and agenda...and I will criticize and ridicule his wife and children at every opportunity."

This site is as ridulous as World Net Daily. Although I will give them credit for admitting it.

-- Anonymous, March 04, 2001