The "we need a new "prepped" couple to adopt the new born blue eyed baby because THE 15 YEAR OLD BIRTH MOTHER can't do it" thread is one of the saddest examples of what arose out of the hysterics whipped up by North, Yourdon and Hyatt and the many thousands they all mislead. ANYONE who doesn't have a sense of "Moral Outrage" at the *de-facto* offer of an infant to strangers on 2 extremists lists, is in turn, bereft of a normal "Moral Compass". IF............one of the DE-BUNKERS.....or ANTI-DOOMERS had done such a thing, you can be certain that it would have been used by all the Y2k Fear Forces as an "example" of the Decline of the West. INSTEAD, the Fear Brigade now covers up the role they played by "SPINNING" a MYTH about the "sincere humanitarian role" of Dennis J. **Irresponsible** of the World and his "giving shelter" to the TWO INFANTS IN THE LAW's EYES........instead of calling RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE whether a Church, a suitable private or even the local Public Agencies who are TRAINED TO HELP SUCH PEOPLE. That the Mother of the 15 year old new Mother would put that on-line with two lists of Y2k Extremist rather than even seek out *private authorities* shows how committed to STRANGERS with a set of beliefs can become. Anyone who doesn't think that Aaron Lynch's Y2k Meme Thinking was not in place here simply has not done their home work. AND ALL THE DIM-WITS WHO THINK THE LISTS/FORUMS OF HYATT, YOURDON AND NORTH ARE **HARMLESS** SIMPLY DENY THE FACT: A MOTHER OF AN UNWED 15 YEAR OLD NEW MOTHER OFFERRED THE NEW BORN OVER THE INTERNET TO STRANGERS!!!! THAT IS FACT.........obscured with the rhetoric the Propagandists tried to cover up after the fact. AND NOTE THAT THE TWO LEADERS OF TWO OF THOSE LISTS: HYATT AND YOURDON ARE STILL MOOT ON THE SUBJECT. RIGHTS OF THE BIRTH MOTHER WHO WAS 15 YEARS OLD? WHAT RIGHTS ARE THOSE? From the "Leave us alone but make sure the TV Camera gets my name and local town right" Dennis J. Thread ending: LINK TO DENNIS J. VICTIM's FAVORITE THREAD
http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002vIu None that the posters to any ****extremist list for y2k prep**** should be discussing. Suppose that baby or the mother had gotten sick near dennis j. "I'm being picked on" OLSON's CAT in his basement?? I'm tired of the trolling by a few who rant about new de-bunkers/pollies. DENNIS J. the "VICTIM OF NON-DOOMERS' PERSECUTION" should be seeing someone who can "ANALYZE" why he blew money on PREPs ($20,000) and NOW IS HURTING because of the "Feast or Famine" nature of contract programming. If he can't hold a steady job, he needs to find out why. Then he could take care of his family in the way he *claims* he did for Y2k. Then, we need to explore why some TROLLS AND EXTREMIST use any list to........excuse themselves and dennis j. olson for any *extremism* they assume is "our right". LIKE IGNORING THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN AND NOT REPORTING A HOMELESS 15 Yr. OLD NEW MOTHER AND DAYS OLD BABY TO AUTHORITIES. GET IT STRAIGHT, THERE WERE *DOOMERS* AND *NON-DOOMERS*. And the "NON-DOOMERS" represent the Vast Majority of the World. EVERY ATTEMPT to portray the world as the two camps, "Doomers and Pollies" was just another device by the propagandists at: "THEM Vs. US" CULTISM that was encouraged by North, Hyatt and Yourdon to the end and even now after the First Quarter of TEOTW. It is that *SPURIOUS* "FOR MONEY" effort that the De-Bunkers and I exposed to the LIGHT OF DAY AND CONTINUE TO EXPOSE FOR THE FRAUD IT IS EVEN NOW AS ....Yourdon tries to milk one more book to peddle to the fringe elements he moved 250,000 copies of his y2k comic book tb2000. AND IN THE BACKWASH OF THE PROPAGANDA ARISES THE **MISLEAD** LIKE DENNIS J. "I WILL SHOOT PEOPLE AT MY FRONT DOOR" OLSON who shows up on National TV NEWS as "Dennis Olson, Madison, Wisc." with his Generator that can "power 2 houses. Why 2 houses? Y2k" said the Narrator. DENNIS J. Victim should be remembered for one thing: he represents the thousands of people mislead down the y2k road by yourdon, hyatt and north. BUT WHAT HE DID RE: THE 15 YEAR OLD UNWED VICTIM OF A RAPE OR "DATE RAPE" BIRTH MOTHER AND HER MOTHER AND HER CHILD.......should be used as a *text book example* long after he gives his preps to a food bank as he stated on national tv news. AND WHEN HE *CRIES* THAT HE JUST WANTS TO BE LEFT ALONE BY THE "DE-BUNKERS" AND "TURNCOATS" FROM THE YOURDON CHURCH, REMEMBER IT. FOR IT SHOWS THAT DENNIS J. VICTIM IS A VICTIM ALSO. Now we have one of the Yourdon Zombies throwing in his/her 1/2 cent views defending "Dennis The Victim" who can't even take care of himself in normal times because of his irrational FEARS. And make no mistake about this, Dennis J. Victim is truly a representative VICTIM of the ONLINE HYSTERICS WHIPPED UP BY EDWARD YOURDON AND HIS RING LEADERS THEMSELVES FOLLOWING THE TACTICS OF ONE GARY NORTH............MISLEADING ALL WITH THEIR *PSEUDO-SURVIVALIST* PROPAGANDA FOR MONEY. TAKE YOURDON AND NORTH OUT OF THE PICTURE AND DENNIS J. VICTIM IS JUST ANOTHER AVERAGE *MALCONTENT* ONLINE RANTING ABOUT THEM AND HIS "RIGHTS" TO BEAR ARMS AND..... ........MOST IMPORTANTLY.....HIS GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO SHOOT HIS MOUTH OFF AND MAKE A FOOL OF HIMSELF. ADD IN Y2K AND YOU GET.............THE TRAGEDY OF DENNIS J. VICTIM,,,,,,,MISLEADING A 15 YEAR OLD *********RAPE VICTIM****** NEW BORN MOTHER, THE 15 YEAR OLD'S MOTHER AND TRYING TO BULL SHIT HIS WAY ABOUT ALL THIS BEING "SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT". NOT ONCE, NEVER DID HE CALL IN THE AUTHORITIES BECAUSE IN HIS ARROGANT, BRAINWASHED Y2K POLLUTED BRAIN, **HE**,,,,,,,DENNIS J. REALLY *KNEW BEST*. (ESPECIALLY AFTER A TV CREW FROM MILWAUKEE SHOWS UP TO GIVE HIM SOME NATIONAL EXPOSURE.) Get the rest of the picture now:........................a 15 year old unmarried "Birth Mother"'s Mother had placed the "for adoption" note on TB I and the note even contained a line about the baby being blue eyed and "already has hair" (blonde). The "open" adoption desired was specific for a Y2k "preparer" which in less than 20 days would include the entire world population who had prepared and not overprepared like the brain washed Yourdon nuts. FIFTEEN YEARS OLD, UNWED MOTHER HAS ***RIGHTS TO WHAT*****? TO LET HER MOTHER PUT A NOTICE ON AN EXTREMIST LIST WHOSE LEADER "KNEW WHAT HE KNEW" AND WHAT HE KNEW LEAD HIM TO **COMPLETELY WRONG CONCLUSIONS ON *THE NEED TO PREP**?? AND LET HERSELF AND NEW BORN BE SHELTERED BY SOMEONE THREATENING "DEATH" TO ALL FOR COMING TO HIS DOOR? WHO ROUTINELY DELIGHTED IN DISCUSSING THOSE WHO WOULD BE "SORRY" THEY HAD NOT "PREPPED" BECAUSE HE HAD? WHO AFTER THE POST RANTED ABOUT *NEVER* ALLOWING THE *AUTHORITIES* NEAR THE NEW BORN ?? THERE WASN'T EVEN MENTION OF HAVING HER PASTOR OR SPIRITUAL ADVISOR IN THE PICTURE. DANCR "Whether you think this was sufficient reason to reject the deal is really quite irrelevant. It was the birth mother's decision to make, and not yours. " WRONG. AND DANCR You would need to go look for a birth mother that seeks adoptive parents who like to talk about things they don't know anything about. -- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), April 10, 2000. WRONG ___________________ EXCUSE ME "Dancer"? It was Dennis J. "I will shoot Dah Pollies who come to my door because my insurance is paid" who took the TWO CHILDREN in this case in rather than doing what 99 of the people anywhere would do, call the Proper Local Authorities. The "rights" of the Birth Mother? That was the whole point of the protest that arose over this and lead to the Wisconsin Authorities stepping into the picture. HEY, "Dancer" the "birth Mother" with such "rights" making such "decisions" WAS A WHOPPING 15 YEARS OLD, UNMARRIED AND THEREFORE, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW IN MOST STATES, COUNTRIES AND RELIGIONS.........."AN INFANT" HERSELF. And you had all the screaming Banshees charging "statism" and all such anti-Gov. Rants typical of Fat Dennis. _______________________ . Whether you think this was sufficient reason to reject the deal is really quite irrelevant. It was the birth mother's decision to make, and not yours. You say that prospective adoptive families need not prove that they adhere to some unusual beliefs of a birth family. As a matter of fact, though, in an open adoption, they may need to. The way it works is, if I want, I can specify that I want my child to go to nudist atheist vegetarians on a secluded self-sufficient farm, who are committed to not vaccinating for childhood illnesses, already homeschooling other children, and agree to allow me quarterly visitations. Good luck meeting my criteria. But if you don't meet them, you can't call some adoption police and whine that my criteria are unreasonable. You would need to go look for a birth mother that seeks adoptive parents who like to talk about things they don't know anything about. -- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), April 10, 2000. AND "DANCR" NEEDS TO STOP TRYING TO "DEFEND" .......WHAT IS DEFENSELESS. cpr LINK TO DENNIS J. VICTIM's FAVORITE THREAD
http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002vIu

-- cpr (buytexas@swbell.net), April 10, 2000

Answers

RE-FORMATTED?? (I HOPE.) RIGHTS OF THE BIRTH MOTHER WHO WAS 15 YEARS OLD? WHAT RIGHTS ARE THOSE? From the "Leave us alone but make sure the TV Camera gets my name and local town right" Dennis J. Thread ending: LINK TO DENNIS J. VICTIM's FAVORITE THREAD http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002vIu None that the posters to any ****extremist list for y2k prep**** should be discussing. Suppose that baby or the mother had gotten sick near dennis j. "I'm being picked on" OLSON's CAT in his basement?? I'm tired of the trolling by a few who rant about new de- bunkers/pollies. DENNIS J. the "VICTIM OF NON-DOOMERS' PERSECUTION" should be seeing someone who can "ANALYZE" why he blew money on PREPs ($20,000) and NOW IS HURTING because of the "Feast or Famine" nature of contract programming. If he can't hold a steady job, he needs to find out why. Then he could take care of his family in the way he *claims* he did for Y2k. Then, we need to explore why some TROLLS AND EXTREMIST use any list to........excuse themselves and dennis j. olson for any *extremism* they assume is "our right". LIKE IGNORING THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN AND NOT REPORTING A HOMELESS 15 Yr. OLD NEW MOTHER AND DAYS OLD BABY TO AUTHORITIES. GET IT STRAIGHT, THERE WERE *DOOMERS* AND *NON-DOOMERS*. And the "NON- DOOMERS" represent the Vast Majority of the World. EVERY ATTEMPT to portray the world as the two camps, "Doomers and Pollies" was just another device by the propagandists at: "THEM Vs. US" CULTISM that was encouraged by North, Hyatt and Yourdon to the end and even now after the First Quarter of TEOTW. It is that *SPURIOUS* "FOR MONEY" effort that the De-Bunkers and I exposed to the LIGHT OF DAY AND CONTINUE TO EXPOSE FOR THE FRAUD IT IS EVEN NOW AS ....Yourdon tries to milk one more book to peddle to the fringe elements he moved 250,000 copies of his y2k comic book tb2000. AND IN THE BACKWASH OF THE PROPAGANDA ARISES THE **MISLEAD** LIKE DENNIS J. "I WILL SHOOT PEOPLE AT MY FRONT DOOR" OLSON who shows up on National TV NEWS as "Dennis Olson, Madison, Wisc." with his Generator that can "power 2 houses. Why 2 houses? Y2k" said the Narrator. DENNIS J. Victim should be remembered for one thing: he represents the thousands of people mislead down the y2k road by yourdon, hyatt and north. BUT WHAT HE DID RE: THE 15 YEAR OLD UNWED VICTIM OF A RAPE OR "DATE RAPE" BIRTH MOTHER AND HER MOTHER AND HER CHILD.......should be used as a *text book example* long after he gives his preps to a food bank as he stated on national tv news. AND WHEN HE *CRIES* THAT HE JUST WANTS TO BE LEFT ALONE BY THE "DE- BUNKERS" AND "TURNCOATS" FROM THE YOURDON CHURCH, REMEMBER IT. FOR IT SHOWS THAT DENNIS J. VICTIM IS A VICTIM ALSO. Now we have one of the Yourdon Zombies throwing in his/her 1/2 cent views defending "Dennis The Victim" who can't even take care of himself in normal times because of his irrational FEARS. And make no mistake about this, Dennis J. Victim is truly a representative VICTIM of the ONLINE HYSTERICS WHIPPED UP BY EDWARD YOURDON AND HIS RING LEADERS THEMSELVES FOLLOWING THE TACTICS OF ONE GARY NORTH............MISLEADING ALL WITH THEIR *PSEUDO-SURVIVALIST* PROPAGANDA FOR MONEY. TAKE YOURDON AND NORTH OUT OF THE PICTURE AND DENNIS J. VICTIM IS JUST ANOTHER AVERAGE *MALCONTENT* ONLINE RANTING ABOUT THEM AND HIS "RIGHTS" TO BEAR ARMS AND..... ........MOST IMPORTANTLY.....HIS GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO SHOOT HIS MOUTH OFF AND MAKE A FOOL OF HIMSELF. ADD IN Y2K AND YOU GET.............THE TRAGEDY OF DENNIS J. VICTIM,,,,,,,MISLEADING A 15 YEAR OLD *********RAPE VICTIM****** NEW BORN MOTHER, THE 15 YEAR OLD'S MOTHER AND TRYING TO BULL SHIT HIS WAY ABOUT ALL THIS BEING "SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT". NOT ONCE, NEVER DID HE CALL IN THE AUTHORITIES BECAUSE IN HIS ARROGANT, BRAINWASHED Y2K POLLUTED BRAIN, **HE**,,,,,,,DENNIS J. REALLY *KNEW BEST*. (ESPECIALLY AFTER A TV CREW FROM MILWAUKEE SHOWS UP TO GIVE HIM SOME NATIONAL EXPOSURE.) Get the rest of the picture now:........................a 15 year old unmarried "Birth Mother"'s Mother had placed the "for adoption" note on TB I and the note even contained a line about the baby being blue eyed and "already has hair" (blonde). The "open" adoption desired was specific for a Y2k "preparer" which in less than 20 days would include the entire world population who had prepared and not overprepared like the brain washed Yourdon nuts. FIFTEEN YEARS OLD, UNWED MOTHER HAS ***RIGHTS TO WHAT*****? TO LET HER MOTHER PUT A NOTICE ON AN EXTREMIST LIST WHOSE LEADER "KNEW WHAT HE KNEW" AND WHAT HE KNEW LEAD HIM TO **COMPLETELY WRONG CONCLUSIONS ON *THE NEED TO PREP**?? AND LET HERSELF AND NEW BORN BE SHELTERED BY SOMEONE THREATENING "DEATH" TO ALL FOR COMING TO HIS DOOR? WHO ROUTINELY DELIGHTED IN DISCUSSING THOSE WHO WOULD BE "SORRY" THEY HAD NOT "PREPPED" BECAUSE HE HAD? WHO AFTER THE POST RANTED ABOUT *NEVER* ALLOWING THE *AUTHORITIES* NEAR THE NEW BORN ?? THERE WASN'T EVEN MENTION OF HAVING HER PASTOR OR SPIRITUAL ADVISOR IN THE PICTURE. DANCR "Whether you think this was sufficient reason to reject the deal is really quite irrelevant. It was the birth mother's decision to make, and not yours. " WRONG. AND DANCR You would need to go look for a birth mother that seeks adoptive parents who like to talk about things they don't know anything about. -- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), April 10, 2000. WRONG ___________________ EXCUSE ME "Dancer"? It was Dennis J. "I will shoot Dah Pollies who come to my door because my insurance is paid" who took the TWO CHILDREN in this case in rather than doing what 99 of the people anywhere would do, call the Proper Local Authorities. The "rights" of the Birth Mother? That was the whole point of the protest that arose over this and lead to the Wisconsin Authorities stepping into the picture. HEY, "Dancer" the "birth Mother" with such "rights" making such "decisions" WAS A WHOPPING 15 YEARS OLD, UNMARRIED AND THEREFORE, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW IN MOST STATES, COUNTRIES AND RELIGIONS.........."AN INFANT" HERSELF. And you had all the screaming Banshees charging "statism" and all such anti-Gov. Rants typical of Fat Dennis. ______________________ . DANCR: Whether you think this was sufficient reason to reject the deal is really quite irrelevant. It was the birth mother's decision to make, and not yours. xxxxxxxx BULL. (And the Books of the Old and New Testament alone have some guidelines about that.) xxxxxxxxx You say that prospective adoptive families need not prove that they adhere to some unusual beliefs of a birth family. As a matter of fact, though, in an open adoption, they may need to. The way it works is, if I want, I can specify that I want my child to go to nudist atheist vegetarians on a secluded self-sufficient farm, who are committed to not vaccinating for childhood illnesses, already homeschooling other children, and agree to allow me quarterly visitations. Good luck meeting my criteria. But if you don't meet them, you can't call some adoption police and whine that my criteria are unreasonable. You would need to go look for a birth mother that seeks adoptive parents who like to talk about things they don't know anything about. -- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), April 10, 2000. _______________________________ AND "DANCR" NEEDS TO STOP TRYING TO "DEFEND" .......WHAT IS DEFENSELESS. cpr LINK TO DENNIS J. VICTIM's FAVORITE THREAD
http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002vIu

-- cpr (buytexas@swbell.net), April 10, 2000.

CPR:

This is all real valuable stuff, but the lack of formatting makes it impossible to read. This is what you want...

Subject: The 15 yr. old new Mother, her "rights" and "Don't Pick On Me" St. Dennis the Victim

The "we need a new "prepped" couple to adopt the new born blue eyed baby because THE 15 YEAR OLD BIRTH MOTHER can't do it" thread is one of the saddest examples of what arose out of the hysterics whipped up by North, Yourdon and Hyatt and the many thousands they all mislead.

ANYONE who doesn't have a sense of "Moral Outrage" at the *de-facto* offer of an infant to strangers on 2 extremists lists, is in turn, bereft of a normal "Moral Compass".

IF............one of the DE-BUNKERS.....or ANTI-DOOMERS had done such a thing, you can be certain that it would have been used by all the Y2k Fear Forces as an "example" of the Decline of the West.

INSTEAD, the Fear Brigade now covers up the role they played by "SPINNING" a MYTH about the "sincere humanitarian role" of Dennis J. **Irresponsible** of the World and his "giving shelter" to the TWO INFANTS IN THE LAW's EYES........instead of calling RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE whether a Church, a suitable private or even the local Public Agencies who are TRAINED TO HELP SUCH PEOPLE.

That the Mother of the 15 year old new Mother would put that on-line with two lists of Y2k Extremist rather than even seek out *private authorities* shows how committed to STRANGERS with a set of beliefs can become.

Anyone who doesn't think that Aaron Lynch's Y2k Meme Thinking was not in place here simply has not done their home work.

AND ALL THE DIM-WITS WHO THINK THE LISTS/FORUMS OF HYATT, YOURDON AND NORTH ARE **HARMLESS** SIMPLY DENY THE FACT:

A MOTHER OF AN UNWED 15 YEAR OLD NEW MOTHER OFFERRED THE NEW BORN OVER THE INTERNET TO STRANGERS!!!!

THAT IS FACT.........obscured with the rhetoric the Propagandists tried to cover up after the fact.

AND NOTE THAT THE TWO LEADERS OF TWO OF THOSE LISTS: HYATT AND YOURDON ARE STILL MOOT ON THE SUBJECT.

RIGHTS OF THE BIRTH MOTHER WHO WAS 15 YEARS OLD? WHAT RIGHTS ARE THOSE?

From the "Leave us alone but make sure the TV Camera gets my name and local town right" Dennis J. Thread ending:

LINK TO DENNIS J. VICTIM's FAVORITE THREAD
http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002vIu None that the posters to any ****extremist list for y2k prep**** should be discussing. Suppose that baby or the mother had gotten sick near dennis j. "I'm being picked on" OLSON's CAT in his basement??

I'm tired of the trolling by a few who rant about new de- bunkers/pollies.

DENNIS J. the "VICTIM OF NON-DOOMERS' PERSECUTION" should be seeing someone who can "ANALYZE" why he blew money on PREPs ($20,000) and NOW IS HURTING because of the "Feast or Famine" nature of contract programming. If he can't hold a steady job, he needs to find out why. Then he could take care of his family in the way he *claims* he did for Y2k.

Then, we need to explore why some TROLLS AND EXTREMIST use any list to........excuse themselves and dennis j. olson for any *extremism* they assume is "our right".

LIKE IGNORING THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN AND NOT REPORTING A HOMELESS 15 Yr. OLD NEW MOTHER AND DAYS OLD BABY TO AUTHORITIES. GET IT STRAIGHT, THERE WERE *DOOMERS* AND *NON-DOOMERS*. And the "NON- DOOMERS" represent the Vast Majority of the World.

EVERY ATTEMPT to portray the world as the two camps, "Doomers and Pollies" was just another device by the propagandists at: "THEM Vs. US" CULTISM that was encouraged by North, Hyatt and Yourdon to the end and even now after the First Quarter of TEOTW.

It is that *SPURIOUS* "FOR MONEY" effort that the De-Bunkers and I exposed to the LIGHT OF DAY AND CONTINUE TO EXPOSE FOR THE FRAUD IT IS EVEN NOW AS ....Yourdon tries to milk one more book to peddle to the fringe elements he moved 250,000 copies of his y2k comic book tb2000.

AND IN THE BACKWASH OF THE PROPAGANDA ARISES THE **MISLEAD** LIKE DENNIS J. "I WILL SHOOT PEOPLE AT MY FRONT DOOR" OLSON who shows up on National TV NEWS as "Dennis Olson, Madison, Wisc." with his Generator that can "power 2 houses. Why 2 houses? Y2k" said the Narrator.

DENNIS J. Victim should be remembered for one thing: he represents the thousands of people mislead down the y2k road by yourdon, hyatt and north.

BUT WHAT HE DID RE: THE 15 YEAR OLD UNWED VICTIM OF A RAPE OR "DATE RAPE" BIRTH MOTHER AND HER MOTHER AND HER CHILD.......should be used as a *text book example* long after he gives his preps to a food bank as he stated on national tv news.

AND WHEN HE *CRIES* THAT HE JUST WANTS TO BE LEFT ALONE BY THE "DE- BUNKERS" AND "TURNCOATS" FROM THE YOURDON CHURCH, REMEMBER IT. FOR IT SHOWS THAT DENNIS J. VICTIM IS A VICTIM ALSO.

Now we have one of the Yourdon Zombies throwing in his/her 1/2 cent views defending "Dennis The Victim" who can't even take care of himself in normal times because of his irrational FEARS.

And make no mistake about this, Dennis J. Victim is truly a representative VICTIM of the ONLINE HYSTERICS WHIPPED UP BY EDWARD YOURDON AND HIS RING LEADERS THEMSELVES FOLLOWING THE TACTICS OF ONE GARY NORTH............MISLEADING ALL WITH THEIR *PSEUDO-SURVIVALIST* PROPAGANDA FOR MONEY.

TAKE YOURDON AND NORTH OUT OF THE PICTURE AND DENNIS J. VICTIM IS JUST ANOTHER AVERAGE *MALCONTENT* ONLINE RANTING ABOUT THEM AND HIS "RIGHTS" TO BEAR ARMS AND.....

........MOST IMPORTANTLY.....HIS GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO SHOOT HIS MOUTH OFF AND MAKE A FOOL OF HIMSELF.

ADD IN Y2K AND YOU GET.............THE TRAGEDY OF DENNIS J. VICTIM,,,,,,,MISLEADING A 15 YEAR OLD *********RAPE VICTIM****** NEW BORN MOTHER, THE 15 YEAR OLD'S MOTHER AND TRYING TO BULL SHIT HIS WAY ABOUT ALL THIS BEING "SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT".

NOT ONCE, NEVER DID HE CALL IN THE AUTHORITIES BECAUSE IN HIS ARROGANT, BRAINWASHED Y2K POLLUTED BRAIN, **HE**,,,,,,,DENNIS J. REALLY *KNEW BEST*.

(ESPECIALLY AFTER A TV CREW FROM MILWAUKEE SHOWS UP TO GIVE HIM SOME NATIONAL EXPOSURE.)

Get the rest of the picture now:........................a 15 year old unmarried "Birth Mother"'s Mother had placed the "for adoption" note on TB I and the note even contained a line about the baby being blue eyed and "already has hair" (blonde).

The "open" adoption desired was specific for a Y2k "preparer" which in less than 20 days would include the entire world population who had prepared and not overprepared like the brain washed Yourdon nuts.

FIFTEEN YEARS OLD, UNWED MOTHER HAS ***RIGHTS TO WHAT*****?

TO LET HER MOTHER PUT A NOTICE ON AN EXTREMIST LIST WHOSE LEADER "KNEW WHAT HE KNEW" AND WHAT HE KNEW LEAD HIM TO **COMPLETELY WRONG CONCLUSIONS ON *THE NEED TO PREP**??

AND LET HERSELF AND NEW BORN BE SHELTERED BY SOMEONE THREATENING "DEATH" TO ALL FOR COMING TO HIS DOOR? WHO ROUTINELY DELIGHTED IN DISCUSSING THOSE WHO WOULD BE "SORRY" THEY HAD NOT "PREPPED" BECAUSE HE HAD?

WHO AFTER THE POST RANTED ABOUT *NEVER* ALLOWING THE *AUTHORITIES* NEAR THE NEW BORN ??

THERE WASN'T EVEN MENTION OF HAVING HER PASTOR OR SPIRITUAL ADVISOR IN THE PICTURE.

DANCR "Whether you think this was sufficient reason to reject the deal is really quite irrelevant. It was the birth mother's decision to make, and not yours. "

WRONG.

AND DANCR

You would need to go look for a birth mother that seeks adoptive parents who like to talk about things they don't know anything about. -- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), April 10, 2000.

WRONG

___________________

EXCUSE ME "Dancer"? It was Dennis J. "I will shoot Dah Pollies who come to my door because my insurance is paid" who took the TWO CHILDREN in this case in rather than doing what 99 of the people anywhere would do, call the Proper Local Authorities.

The "rights" of the Birth Mother?

That was the whole point of the protest that arose over this and lead to the Wisconsin Authorities stepping into the picture.

HEY, "Dancer" the "birth Mother" with such "rights" making such "decisions" WAS A WHOPPING 15 YEARS OLD, UNMARRIED AND THEREFORE, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW IN MOST STATES, COUNTRIES AND RELIGIONS.........."AN INFANT" HERSELF.

And you had all the screaming Banshees charging "statism" and all such anti-Gov. Rants typical of Fat Dennis.

_______________________ . Whether you think this was sufficient reason to reject the deal is really quite irrelevant. It was the birth mother's decision to make, and not yours.

You say that prospective adoptive families need not prove that they adhere to some unusual beliefs of a birth family. As a matter of fact, though, in an open adoption, they may need to. The way it works is, if I want, I can specify that I want my child to go to nudist atheist vegetarians on a secluded self-sufficient farm, who are committed to not vaccinating for childhood illnesses, already homeschooling other children, and agree to allow me quarterly visitations. Good luck meeting my criteria. But if you don't meet them, you can't call some adoption police and whine that my criteria are unreasonable. You would need to go look for a birth mother that seeks adoptive parents who like to talk about things they don't know anything about.

-- Dancr (addy.available@my.webpage), April 10, 2000.

AND "DANCR" NEEDS TO STOP TRYING TO "DEFEND" .......WHAT IS DEFENSELESS.

cpr

-- Y2K Pro (y2kpro1@hotmail.com), April 10, 2000.

off off off

-- (hmm@hmm.hmm), April 10, 2000.

cpr,

I didn't read your dissertation (something about overly long posts shouting at me in all caps with no formatting), so cannot comment on the point of your thread...assuming there is one. You might find the following URL helpful:
HTML Playground.
It's here on the LUSENET server, and you can practice posting HTML formatting there. They might be able to help you with that sticky caps lock key, too.

-- (trying@to.help), April 10, 2000.

THANKS but no thanks. Been there long ago. I think the loss of spacing and paragraph breaks infects many others who cut and paste here. BIFFY has 4 settings depending on what you posted but you could only use the inside the "body" tags. On some other forums if you try to use html, you end up with an invisible post.

But, I hardly need to take any tutorial in html. I write HTML ON THE FLY (see samples embedded in this post) and only recently started using Front Page instead of the "Visual Notepad" many command line programmers prefer against the Weenie GUI html crutches. F.P. manages the whole site easily and you can flip to naked HTML or use the "reveal codes".

NOTE HTML takes about 20 minutes to learn That is Greenspun's claim and his "tutorial" is as good as any if a bit too long. His SQL Tutorial is FAR BETTER.

I learned html in 1995 and am adding XML now. I programmed 2 sites in the first two weeks after reading Laura LeMay's first book on html. That first book made her one of the first "Net Celebrities". XML is even easier but *using XML* requires far more technical knowledge than html which is nothing but a "mark up" language sub-set of GML. Either there is a fluke in Eudora's latest that loses the wysiwyg in cut and paste, or: The non-Win/Office Clipboard I just downloaded with multiple C&P is wiping out the spaces, OR......MOST LIKELY since I'm not alone in this problem, there is a new fluke in the ORACLE versions Phil G. is using here.

-- cpr (buytexas@swbell.net), April 10, 2000.

creeper, For such a hotshot programer, you seem to make the same mistakes over and over and over again...

On a different note... Please give up your one man crusade to save the world from what you perceive as "wacko's".. all you'll acommplish is to turn this forum into another hate site like De Bunker and BIFFY.... time to move on :-)

-- Netghost (ng@no.yr), April 10, 2000.

LOL!!!

CPR and PRO, a couple of real fricking geniuses!!!

-- Hawk (flyin@high.again), April 10, 2000.

Hawkie Poo,

You wouldn't know a genius if you saw one, unless they looked like a gerbil that you could shove up your ass.

It's past your bedtime, mommy is calling to tuck you in.

-- Monkey Spanker (spanking@way.com), April 11, 2000.

BTW. What is that fuzzy thing at the top of your post, your face or you ass.

Got to go. Love ya, you lard ass, needle dick.

;)

-- Monkey Spanker (spanking@way.com), April 11, 2000.

"What is that fuzzy thing at the top of your post, your face or you ass."

It's my ass, laughing at you. :-)

-- Hawk (flyin@high.again), April 11, 2000.

TOOOO FUNNYYYY

-- consumer (shh@aol.com), April 11, 2000.

Hawk,

Just read your post on the Dennis Olsen - Tinfoil thread. Too fucking funny, you intellectually superior to anyone. You card you. Please stop I can't take this humorus, self depreciating style you've adopted.

Seriously, tell me all about this planetary alignment, you intellectual giant.

-- Monkey Spanker (spanking@way.com), April 11, 2000.

That would be "self-deprecating".

If you're going to try to use big words, please try to use them properly.

AHHHHHHHHHHH HAAAA HAAAA HAAAA HAAAA HAAAA HAAAA !!!!!!!!

"Too funny" is SO RIGHT, but not for the reason you think!

-- Yeah Right (Ahhhh@haaa.haaa.haaa), April 11, 2000.